GreenAddress: Increasing Bitcoin's Block-size Limit is not Scaling: it's Pivoting

GreenAddress: Increasing Bitcoin's Block-size Limit is not Scaling: it's Pivoting

Bitcoin wallet provider GreenAddress was always critical of raising Bitcoin's block-size limit. As one of the first in the space in May of this year, the European multisig-wallet and software company publicly opposed Bitcoin XT and Bitcoin Core developer Gavin Andresen's initial plans to increase the maximum block size. Now, more than six months later,....


Related News

Jeff Garzik Proposes BIP 202: Block Size Increase to 2 MB

Bitcoin Core Developer Jeff Garzik has introduced Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 202, proposing that the Bitcoin community and miners take small and economically sound steps in increasing the maximum Bitcoin block size to 2 megabytes. Over the past few months, bitcoin core developers have proposed a number of BIPs including BIP 100 and 101, to increase the Bitcoin block size up to 8 megabytes. However, Bitcoin experts have criticized such proposals with concerns that it may "break" the Bitcoin code. "Bitcoin's block size limit needs to be increased in order to achieve wide Bitcoin....

Scaling Bitcoin Workshop: Increase Block Size to 2-4MB?

During the Scaling Bitcoin workshop held in Montreal a few weeks back, some suggestions to increase the block size limit from the current 1MB to 2-4MB were raised. Participants seemed to focus on Adam Back's 2-4-8 block size increase proposal, although notable developers appeared to support a smaller short-term bump in limits. Some discussions on the bitcoin-dev mailing list apparently revealed that some core developers are interested in a short-term fix. Scaling Bitcoin and Block Size Debate. Prior to this workshop, bitcoin developers and members of the community have been debating on....

Jon Matonis Believes the Block Size Debate is a Precursor to a Block Reward Debate

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but sometimes people say things that just don't make sense. Jon Matonis had such a moment this morning on Twitter. Here he goes, before much more is written here: This might be how we know that the block size debate is getting out of control when people have the opportunity to make such presumptuous statements as that. At no time has any prominent proponent of increasing the block size spoken of increasing the block reward or removing the 21 million coin limit. Bitcoin Core development is not a central bank, and, as at least one person told Matonis on....

Gregory Maxwell & Gavin Andresen Shed Interesting Light on Bitcoin Block Size Debate

One of the main reasons why the Bitcoin block size debate has been attracting so much attention is that there is a growing number of network transactions that need to be validated. By increasing the Bitcoin block size limit, more transactions can be included in every network block. According to Gregory Maxwell, there is no real need to include more....

The Optimal Block Size

In this article I will explain how the size of Bitcoin blocks is determined in the absence of an arbitrary size limit. Oleg has already written an excellent post on this topic, but I have a few things to add and I wish to relate the discussion to the current debate over increasing the block size. If the maximum limit on block size is removed, it is not the case that blocks will simply grow without limit. There is a natural size that is determined by the market. The block size will change until the marginal revenue of adding more transactions approaches the marginal cost; this could happen....