California Bitcoin Bill May Pose Problems For Startups
Want to start a new Bitcoin business in California? A new legislative proposal may make you think twice. On February 27, 2015 AB 1326, was introduced by Matt Dababneh as part of the Money Transmission Act. As an Assembly member, Matt Dababneh represents the Banking and Finance Committee as Chairman. He and the state of California want you to pay $5,000 just to start your business and be considered a legal operation. The California Bitcoin bill AB 1326 would require all non-exempt Bitcoin and virtual currency businesses to pay this non-refundable fee to obtain a license from the Department....
Related News
A digital currency bill has been proposed and amended in the state of California, easing the burden for bitcoin startups. The initial proposal required individuals and companies offering services that involve bitcoin or other digital currencies to first obtain a license. However, this could wind up stifling innovation and being too costly for bitcoin startups. With that, the revised version enables small-scale business concepts to receive conditional approval from the state's Commission of Business Oversight under the state's Money Transmission Act. Lower Burden on Bitcoin Startups.
California is getting closer to outright legalizing Bitcoin in the state with the proposed bill clearing a committee vote yesterday. Back in September of last year, California passed AB 786, a piece of legislation that makes it easier doing in-state business for Bitcoin startups. This time, a bill dubbed as AB-129 Lawful Money, which would legalize cryptocurrencies in the state, passed the Senate Banking and Financial Institutions Committee yesterday by a 7-1 vote. Previously, the bill was unanimously approved in the California Assembly by a 75 to 0 vote. The next step for the bill will be....
The Bitcoin Foundation has launched a fresh appeal to stop the latest and “even worse” BitLicense-style bill from becoming law in California. California Bill ‘Worse Than Before’. Bill AB-1326, which has become known as the ‘California BitLicense,’ passed the State Assembly and is now awaiting its Senate second reading today. According to opponents,....
California is set to follow New York’s lead, but the Bitcoin Foundation wants to stop the state from getting its own version of the BitLicense. The California Bitcoin License bill designated as AB1326 has undergone several changes in the assembly and senate since it was first introduced last year. It is now awaiting a second reading by Senate. Opponents of the bill, however, claim that the language of it has the potential to reduce California’s capability of supporting digital currency startups in the state. Bitcoin Foundation Education Committee chair Colin Gallagher is one opponent who....
California's AB-1326 bill, which attempted to regulate virtual currency businesses, is no longer active, thanks to a state senator. The controversial bill, penned by Assemblyman Matt Dababneh, was ordered to become an inactive file at the request of Senator Mitchell on 9th September. According to definitions by the Californian government, the bill is now "dormant or dead" but can potentially be re-activated by its author at a later date. Colin Gallagher, chair of the Bitcoin Foundation Education Committee, commented on the bill's status: "While we should remain vigilant (the California....