Bitcoin Core 0.10 Gives Developers Simplified Access to Network Consensus
The latest version of Bitcoin Core was released yesterday, with key changes that address the declining number of nodes, how transaction fees are set for the Bitcoin Core wallet and simplifying the process for developers to get involved with bitcoin projects. It's perhaps the latter point that will have the biggest impact on how developers work with Bitcoin Core. The latest version of it includes a consensus library, which gives programmers easy access to the rules governing consensus on the bitcoin network, without having to run a full node. "We're splitting it out into a standalone....
Related News
Since the beginning of the development of Segregated Witness, an increasing number of alternative Bitcoin hard fork supporters have criticized the implementation process of soft forks on Bitcoin Core, claiming that Core developers have a complete monopoly over the process. Former Bitcoin Core developer Jeff Garzik and Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin particularly stated that proposed soft forks have to undergo a majority consensus among Bitcoin Core developers that ultimately decide whether a soft fork becomes implemented into the BItcoin network. “Soft forks very specifically, from an....
Bitcoin Core developers and leading mining firms have come to a consensus on the block size debate. On February 21, 2016, representatives of the Bitcoin industry and Bitcoin Core developers have finally come to a consensus to settle the never-ending block size debate. The meeting was participated by Bitcoin Core developers and representatives of leading bitcoin mining firms and exchanges including Antpool, BitFury, Bitmain, Bit-X, Blockcloud, BTCC, BW, Coinfloor F2Pool, Genesis Mining, HaoBTC, Huobi, Ledger, OKCoin and Spoodoolies-Tech. All representatives of the abovementioned companies....
Ethereum, a network still in its infancy which was introduced on July 30, 2015, is already dealing with a major conflict amongst its community as a result of a hard fork which was implemented without the full consensus of the community. Even worse, the hard fork was executed to benefit a certain party of the Ethereum community, not the network as a whole. Bitcoin and scaling dilemma. Bitcoin Core developers and the Blockstream team have constantly received heavy criticism over the past few years from the Bitcoin community for their inability to reach consensus on the everlasting blocksize....
The blocksize debate has been brought to the forefront once more as a number of Bitcoin developers, including Gregory Maxwell, CTO of Blockstream and Mark Friedenbach, Core Tech Engineer at Blockstream, came out against the Hong Kong Consensus, arguably the most important document in Bitcoin’s history since the whitepaper. According to what may be a leak of an alleged meeting between pools and miners representing more than 75% of hashpower, consensus has been reached to hardfork to 2mb if Bitcoin Core developers do not release a new Bitcoin Core client with a 2MB hardfork code by August....
Three of China 's biggest mining pools – F2Pool, BTCChina Pool and Huobi Pool – maintain that the Bitcoin Core development team should strive for consensus, and will therefore not support a switch to Bitcoin XT. Given Core developer Gavin Andresen's latest proposal and the current hash-rate distribution on the Bitcoin network, a network wide shift from Bitcoin Core to Bitcoin XT to allow bigger blocks seems infeasible, for now. Lacking consensus among Core developers to raise the block size limit, Andresen has recently shifted his efforts to Mike Hearn's Bitcoin Core fork, Bitcoin XT. In a....