Ethereum community splits over solutions for transaction censorship
Social slashing and even a user-activated soft fork have been suggested as possible responses to the threat of transaction censorship on Ethereum. The Ethereum community has been divided over how to best respond to the threat of protocol-level transaction censorship in the wake of the United States government sanctions on Tornado Cash-linked addresses. Over the last week, Ethereum community members have proposed social slashing or even a user-activated soft fork (UASF) as possible responses to transaction-level censorship on Ethereum, with some calling it a “trap” that will do more harm....
Related News
Ethereum Classic's declaration of independence from Ethereum airs its grievance against ETH while listing its Code of Principles. Ethereum Classic, an offshoot of Ethereum that continues to carry on with the Ethereum legacy blockchain has published its own version of the “declaration of independence” from Ethereum. In the document, Ethereum Classic which came into existence on July 20, 2016, following the implementation of Ethereum hard fork states its plans for the future and the principles to which it will adhere to. Ethereum Classic represents the community that objected Ethereum’s....
An often misunderstood topic is that of chain splits and how they are potentially resolved. With the recent proposal from Shaolinfry discussing User Activated Soft Forks (UASF) getting much attention, these misunderstandings must be clarified to fully understand the implications of chain splits and their potential resolutions. Types of Forks. Miners can create chain splits through the deliberate orphaning of blocks that appear to be valid to some clients. Users maintain a set of consensus rules that they require of all blocks. When users disagree about the sets of consensus rules to....
Bons noted that even with 50% OFAC compliance among Ethereum validators, blocks will still be produced within 30 seconds. Ethereum bulls have hit back against claims the network has become prone to censorship post-Merge, with one arguing that “not even a single” transaction has been censored on the network. In a 19-part thread to his 29,100 followers on Oct. 17, Cyber Capital founder and CIO Justin Bons argued that contrary to “what some Bitcoiners are falsely claiming,” not a single transaction on Ethereum has been stopped as a result of Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions.....
At the end of August, Ethereum network gas costs skyrocketed and tapped a high of $59 per transaction on September 7, according to the average transaction fee spent on that day. The median fee for an ether transaction on September 7 was around $20 per transaction. Days later, ether transaction fees have subsided to a degree as the median and average ether fees have been slashed in half since then.
Ethereum Fees Subside, Transfer Costs Less Expensive
One of the biggest complaints people have with digital currencies is how much the transaction fee can cost to send these assets.....
Censorship in the Bitcoin community has been highly damaging towards efforts to bridge the gap between the various parties of Bitcoin’s block size debate. Roger Ver recently published a post asking users what they find more upsetting: the scalability roadblock or censorship on r/Bitcoin, after which he called for users to use other forums to express....