Bitcoiners Are The Remnant, The Masses Don’t Matter
Mass adoption of Bitcoin isn’t important. Selective adoption is and always has been how any revolutionary technology or transformation comes about. The masses will join by default.I recently read “Isaiah’s Job” by Albert J Nock. It’s an essay that inspired generations of anarcho capitalists and libertarians such as Rothbard and Rand, so if you’ve not yet read it, do so now or bookmark it for later:“Isaiah's Job” by Albert Jay NockI was introduced to it by Francis Pouliot at Bitcoin 2021, on a roundtable with Russell Okung, MVDEX, Matt Snow and a few others. I finally got around to reading....
Related News
Members of the Remnant are inclined toward Bitcoin, while the other classes of society, the parasites and masses, remain antagonistic or ignorant.
Privacy should matter to everyone, but especially to Bitcoiners interested in protecting their wealth.
Dad’s don’t necessarily need special or fancy gifts, but Bitcoiners want to make sure our dads have the Bitcoin tools and gadgets they need.
“We are aware of the importance of being early adopters and our ability to see where things are headed if we don’t correct course.” The post Are Bitcoiners A**holes? appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.
Bitcoin and blockchains are not the only distributed computing models explored under the umbrella of technology. While Bitcoiners have claimed that “bitcoin is the currency of AI,” for instance, others don’t believe this is so. They, in fact, don’t believe they need blockchain to achieve some tasks bitcoiners believe only the blockchain can execute. Their systems include deep learning, evolutionary intelligence, and other novel programs. Oh, and they don’t need to worry about block size debates. They scale. A predominant fallacy in Bitcoin remains that the technology will change the world....